@prefix this: . @prefix sub: . @prefix np: . @prefix dct: . @prefix nt: . @prefix npx: . @prefix xsd: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix orcid: . @prefix ns1: . @prefix prov: . sub:Head { this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion; np:hasProvenance sub:provenance; np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo; a np:Nanopublication . } sub:assertion { sub:assertion dct:creator orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234; ; rdfs:comment """It's very nice to see a nanopublication for this manuscript. The assertion makes sense, except for the subclass statement. It doesn't seem accurate to me to state that this indicator is a kind of concept drift. It seems to be an indicator for the phenomenon of concept drift, but the indicators themselves are different from the phenomena they describe. Therefore, I'd suggest to mark it as a subclass of something like \"Indicator\".""" . } sub:provenance { sub:assertion prov:wasAttributedTo orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234 . } sub:pubinfo { sub:sig npx:hasAlgorithm "RSA"; npx:hasPublicKey "MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCjDGQCS1S+SRnERDuYDXOugdYUP0efEquHJEEHAbU/uLzBVlga89zqrNPCS7fBE6lArBUWEmT8eLKdMapyqvAzI1J3jUWTMhDJF+XFBkUiuiFfNSc4vJJcmi0yujtnuzXsRIG202jyaP4f5ULoskFwaZOSBZJfiE0dsB3D7DTIAQIDAQAB"; npx:hasSignature "eU1n1gs4JhIjCILdJjiJRNcPdEMUi9Edw+v2m7Fi2hm8ZcpLFoI/7+EduJqrqi3+X6xSZKwOyWj3s5icpbzn5x84HG+dj4tmADHqoQQ1PbsI+pucwOQmrlkOxuPu8nWpvRFlAtTjjnAT+V6J2ezuj8qMNcYKIpgd9cIUIXdAsWY="; npx:hasSignatureTarget this: . this: dct:created "2023-12-06T08:16:34.984Z"^^xsd:dateTime; dct:creator orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234; dct:license ; npx:hasNanopubType ; rdfs:label "reviews RAagramW3z"; nt:wasCreatedFromProvenanceTemplate ns1:RANwQa4ICWS5SOjw7gp99nBpXBasapwtZF1fIM3H2gYTM; nt:wasCreatedFromPubinfoTemplate ns1:RAA2MfqdBCzmz9yVWjKLXNbyfBNcwsMmOqcNUxkk1maIM, ns1:RAh1gm83JiG5M6kDxXhaYT1l49nCzyrckMvTzcPn-iv90; nt:wasCreatedFromTemplate ns1:RAVEpTdLrX5XrhNl_gnvTaBcjRRSDu_hhZix8gu2HO7jI . }