dgn-np:NP247948.RAlpeS4Ro1G83tv3lIpUy6dNnCOo7gvqKRE94FnlNjZOk130_provenance { dgn-np:NP247948.RAlpeS4Ro1G83tv3lIpUy6dNnCOo7gvqKRE94FnlNjZOk130_assertiondcterms:description "[The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Working Group found insufficient evidence to recommend prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) testing to inform decisions for when to rebiopsy previously biopsy-negative patients for prostate cancer or to inform decisions to conduct initial biopsies for prostate cancer in at-risk men (e.g., previous elevated prostate-specific antigen test or suspicious digital rectal examination).The EGAPP Working Group found insufficient evidence to recommend PCA3 testing in men with cancer-positive biopsies to determine if the disease is indolent or aggressive in order to develop an optimal treatment plan.Based on the available evidence, the overall certainty of clinical validity to predict the diagnosis of prostate cancer using PCA3 is deemed 'low.' The EGAPP Working Group discourages clinical use for diagnosis unless further evidence supports improved clinical validity.Based on the available evidence, the overall certainty of net health benefit is deemed 'low.' The EGAPP Working Group discourages clinical use unless further evidence supports improved clinical outcomes.]. Sentence from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine."@en ; wi:evidencedgn-void:source_evidence_literature ; sio:SIO_000772miriam-pubmed:24071797 ; prov:wasDerivedFromdgn-void:befree-20150227 ; prov:wasGeneratedByeco:ECO_0000203 . dgn-void:befree-20150227pav:importedOn "2015-02-27"^^xsd:date . dgn-void:source_evidence_literatureaeco:ECO_0000212 ; rdfs:comment "Gene-disease associations inferred from text-mining the literature."@en ; rdfs:label "DisGeNET evidence - LITERATURE"@en . }