@prefix dct: . @prefix dce: . @prefix orcid: . @prefix this: . @prefix sub: . @prefix metrics: . @prefix np: . @prefix pav: . @prefix prov: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix xsd: . @prefix fair: . @prefix foaf: . @prefix dcat: . @prefix fm: . sub:Head { this: np:hasAssertion sub:assertion; np:hasProvenance sub:provenance; np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo; a np:Nanopublication . } sub:assertion { metrics:FM_I2 a fair:FAIR-Metric; foaf:primaryTopic fair:I2 . } sub:provenance { sub:_1 dce:format "application/x-texinfo"; a , dcat:Distribution; dcat:downloadURL . sub:_2 dce:format "application/pdf"; a , dcat:Distribution; dcat:downloadURL . sub:assertion dct:author "Erik Schultes", "Luiz Bonino", "Mark Wilkinson", "Michel Dumontier", "Peter Doorn", "Susanna Sansone"; dct:title "Use FAIR Vocabularies"; rdfs:comment "FAIR Metric for Fair Principle I2"; dcat:distribution sub:_1, sub:_2; prov:wasGeneratedBy "FAIR Metrics Working Group"; fm:comments """michel: there must be a syntax and associated semantics for that language. This is sufficient mark: there needs to be some identity or denotation in the language; ('vanilla') xml and json are not FAIR, so should fail this test *** can you (i) identify elements and (ii) make statements about them, and iii) is there a formally defined interpretation for that -> HTML fails; PDF fails shared -> that there are many users of the language . acknowledged within your community -> hard to prove. . could we use google to query for your filetype (can't discriminate between different models) -> has a media type --> This SHOULD be stated as a IANA code [IANA-MT] standardization of at least this listing process is a good measure of 'sharedness' broadly applicable . that the language is extensible to a domain of interest . you can define your own elements in accordance with the semantics of the language gff3 is not in the IANA list -> what steps would the community need to execute to be listed here? cases like GFF, PDB are not broadly applicable biopax -> is defined vnd.biopax.rdf+xml and built on rdf -> allows users to create new elements and relate them jpg -> widely used, registered, but primarily for image content pdf -> registered, enables users to create their own dictionary. """; fm:examples "None"; fm:measuring "The metadata values and qualified relations should themselves be FAIR, for example, terms from open, community-accepted vocabularies published in an appropriate knowledge-exchange format."; fm:procedure "Resolve IRIs, check FAIRness of the returned document(s)."; fm:rationale "It is not possible to unambiguously interpret metadata represented as simple keywords or other non-qualified symbols. For interoperability, it must be possible to identify data that can be integrated like-with-like. This requires that the data, and the provenance descriptors of the data, should (where reasonable) use vocabularies and terminologies that are, themselves, FAIR."; fm:relevance "All"; fm:requirements "IRIs representing the vocabularies used for (meta)data "; fm:validation "Successful resolution; document is amenable to machine-parsing and identification of terms within it. It may be possible to use FAIRSharing to validate these vocabularies." . } sub:pubinfo { this: dct:created "2017-11-21T00:00:00.0Z"^^xsd:dateTime; dct:rights ; dct:rightsHolder ; pav:authoredBy "Mark Wilkinson", orcid:0000-0001-6960-357X; pav:versionNumber "1" . }