http://rdf.disgenet.org/resource/nanopub/NP805979.RAPg11jEPKLiZhdrehsAuCmvTkXAmHgZSLEvpdOk9SuvM
type: Nanopublication
created: 2016-05-13T12:47:50+02:00
rights: http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
rights holder: IBIGroup
subject: SIO_000983
used data: disgenetv3.0rdf
authored by: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5999-6269
authored by: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-7661
authored by: 0000-0002-9383-528X
authored by: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0169-8159
authored by: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1244-7654
created by: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0169-8159
version: v4.0.0.0

http://rdf.disgenet.org/resource/nanopub/NP805979.RAPg11jEPKLiZhdrehsAuCmvTkXAmHgZSLEvpdOk9SuvM130_assertion
type: Assertion
description: [In subgroup analyses based on pathological type, the Pro variant was significantly associated with an increased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk in all four genetic comparison models (ORPro vs. Arg=1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47, POR=0.003; OR Recessive genetic model=1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.88, POR=0.015; ORDominant genetic model=1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.42, POR=0.001; ORHomozygote model=1.55, 95% CI: 1.14-2.10, POR=0.005), whereas the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk was still uncertain owing to the limited studies included in this meta-analysis.]. Sentence from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
evidence: DisGeNET evidence - LITERATURE
SIO_000772: http://identifiers.org/pubmed/20389250
was generated by: ECO_0000203

befree-2016
imported on: 2016-02-19

DisGeNET evidence - LITERATURE
type: ECO_0000212
comment: Gene-disease associations inferred from text-mining the literature.

disgenetv3.0rdf
version: v4.0.0