sub:assertion {
  <http://eurovoc.europa.eu/3949> <http://schema.org/description> "" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Applied sciences" ;
    a <http://schema.org/DefinedTerm> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/#enrichment_service-account-enrichment> <http://schema.org/name> "service-account-enrichment" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/> <http://schema.org/about> <http://eurovoc.europa.eu/3949> ;
    <http://schema.org/author> <mailto:anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com> , <mailto:erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com> , <mailto:even.fyllingen@rohub.com> , <mailto:ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com> , <mailto:ole.solheim@rohub.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/contentSize> 11257 ;
    <http://schema.org/contentUrl> "https://api.rohub.org/api/ros/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/crate/download/" ;
    <http://schema.org/creator> <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/dateCreated> "2022-03-22 00:57:43.228000+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/dateModified> "2025-03-05 00:59:13.596088+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/datePublished> "2022-03-22 00:57:43.228000+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/description> "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software. The aim of this study was therefore to compare three different software packages for semi-automatic brain tumor segmentation of glioblastoma; namely BrainVoyagerTM QX, ITK-Snap and 3D Slicer, and to make data available for future reference. Pre-operative, contrast enhanced T1-weighted 1.5 or 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were obtained in 20 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma. MRI scans were segmented twice in each software package by two investigators. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software agreement was compared by using differences of means with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA), Dice’s similarity coefficients (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Time expenditure of segmentations was measured using a stopwatch. Eighteen tumors were included in the analyses. Inter-rater agreement was highest for BrainVoyager with difference of means of 0.19 mL and 95 % LoA from -2.42 mL to 2.81 mL. Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software DSC were ≥ 0.93 in all analyses. Time expenditure was approximately 41 min per segmentation in BrainVoyager, and 18 min per segmentation in both 3D Slicer and ITK-Snap. Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice’s similarity coefficients. Time expenditure was highest for BrainVoyager, but all software packages were relatively time-consuming, which may limit usability in an everyday clinical setting." ;
    <http://schema.org/encodingFormat> "application/ld+json" ;
    <http://schema.org/hasPart> <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/0ff0d6cf-f1ef-4640-9db8-d57f3a6ffadd> , <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/186c279f-9ada-4c70-8546-7cec7fd4a85e> , <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/75c82b1c-24f0-4938-a4aa-6ce514b3df83> , <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/df472bdf-7848-4553-a634-2a2c7296e5ad> ;
    <http://schema.org/identifier> "https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773" ;
    <http://schema.org/license> <https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/> ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro-id/rohub/model#creation_mode> "MANUAL" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Concept> "agreement" , "coefficient" , "comparison" , "concord" , "consumption" , "diversity" , "glioblastoma" , "magnetic resonance imaging" , "partition" , "rater" , "software" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#FieldOfResearch> "earth sciences" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#IPTC> "Computing and information technology" , "IT-computer sciences" , "Medical procedure-test" , "Software" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Lemma> "Intra-" , "expenditure" , "glioblastoma" , "magnetic resonance imaging" , "rater" , "segmentation" , "software" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#NASA> "mathematical and computer sciences" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Phrase> "Hausdorff distance" , "differences of means" , "glioblastoma segmentation" , "software packages in terms" , "time expenditure" ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#Sentence> "Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages." , "Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice?s similarity coefficients." , "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software." ;
    <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#TimeReference> "18 min" , "approximately 41 min" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/ro#ResearchObject> , <http://purl.org/wf4ever/roevo#LiveRO> , <http://schema.org/Dataset> , <http://w3id.org/ro/earth-science#DataResearchObject> , <https://w3id.org/ro/terms/earth-science#DataResearchObject> ;
    <https://w3id.org/contentdesc#Domain> "medicine" , "oncology" , "software" ;
    <https://www.w3.org/ns/iana/link-relations/relation#cite-as> "Even Fyllingen, Anne Line Stensjøen, Erik Magnus Berntsen, Ole Solheim, and Ingerid Reinertsen. \"Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages.\" ROHub. Mar 22 ,2022. https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773." .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/0ff0d6cf-f1ef-4640-9db8-d57f3a6ffadd> <http://schema.org/name> "metadata" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder> , <http://schema.org/Dataset> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/186c279f-9ada-4c70-8546-7cec7fd4a85e> <http://schema.org/name> "raw data" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder> , <http://schema.org/Dataset> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/75c82b1c-24f0-4938-a4aa-6ce514b3df83> <http://schema.org/hasPart> <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/b1dd0cba-10c4-4433-a1aa-b06ace1dff57> ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "data" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder> , <http://schema.org/Dataset> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/folders/df472bdf-7848-4553-a634-2a2c7296e5ad> <http://schema.org/hasPart> <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/da6271ed-312a-41d1-a631-45247953d840> ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "biblio" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Folder> , <http://schema.org/Dataset> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/b1dd0cba-10c4-4433-a1aa-b06ace1dff57> dct:bibliographicCitation "Fyllingen, E., Stensjøen, A. L., Berntsen, E. M., Solheim, O., Reinertsen, I. (2016).Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages [Data set]. Norstore. https://doi.org/10.11582/2016.00004" ;
    dct:rightsHolder "USIGT (USIGT)" ;
    dct:type "Image" ;
    <http://schema.org/author> <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/contentUrl> "https://archive.sigma2.no/pages/public/datasetDetail.jsf?id=10.11582/2016.00004" ;
    <http://schema.org/creator> <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/dateCreated> "2016-10-11 00:00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/dateModified> "2022-03-22 00:58:14.814982+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/description> "To facilitate a more widespread use of volumetric tumor segmentation in clinical studies, there is an urgent need for reliable, user-friendly segmentation software. The aim of this study was therefore to compare three different software packages for semi-automatic brain tumor segmentation of glioblastoma; namely BrainVoyagerTM QX, ITK-Snap and 3D Slicer, and to make data available for future reference. Pre-operative, contrast enhanced T1-weighted 1.5 or 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans were obtained in 20 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for glioblastoma. MRI scans were segmented twice in each software package by two investigators. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software agreement was compared by using differences of means with 95 % limits of agreement (LoA), Dice’s similarity coefficients (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). Time expenditure of segmentations was measured using a stopwatch. Eighteen tumors were included in the analyses. Inter-rater agreement was highest for BrainVoyager with difference of means of 0.19 mL and 95 % LoA from -2.42 mL to 2.81 mL. Between-software agreement and 95 % LoA were very similar for the different software packages. Intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software DSC were ≥ 0.93 in all analyses. Time expenditure was approximately 41 min per segmentation in BrainVoyager, and 18 min per segmentation in both 3D Slicer and ITK-Snap. Our main findings were that there is a high agreement within and between the software packages in terms of small intra-rater, inter-rater and between-software differences of means and high Dice’s similarity coefficients. Time expenditure was highest for BrainVoyager, but all software packages were relatively time-consuming, which may limit usability in an everyday clinical setting." ;
    <http://schema.org/license> <https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/> ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Glioblastoma Segmentation: Comparison of Three Different Software Packages" ;
    <http://schema.org/sdDatePublished> "2016-10-11 00:00:00" ;
    a <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Dataset> , <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Resource> , <http://schema.org/MediaObject> ;
    <https://schema.org/maintainer> "Ingerid Reinertsen" .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/resources/da6271ed-312a-41d1-a631-45247953d840> <http://schema.org/author> <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/contentUrl> "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0164891" ;
    <http://schema.org/creator> <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> ;
    <http://schema.org/dateCreated> "2022-03-22 00:58:11.962454+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/dateModified> "2022-03-22 00:58:12.066982+00:00" ;
    <http://schema.org/license> <https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/> ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0164891" ;
    <http://schema.org/sdDatePublished> "2022-03-22 00:58:11.962454+00:00" ;
    a dct:BibliographicResource , <http://purl.org/wf4ever/wf4ever#Resource> , <http://schema.org/MediaObject> .
  <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/ro-crate-metadata.json> dct:conformsTo <https://w3id.org/ro/crate/1.1> ;
    <http://schema.org/about> <https://w3id.org/ro-id/a8c21c10-47aa-4145-a2f2-173f1c501773/> ;
    a <http://schema.org/CreativeWork> .
  <mailto:anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com> <http://schema.org/email> "anne.line.stensjoen@rohub.com" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Anne Line Stensjøen" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <mailto:erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com> <http://schema.org/email> "erik.magnus.berntsen@rohub.com" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Erik Magnus Berntsen" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <mailto:even.fyllingen@rohub.com> <http://schema.org/email> "even.fyllingen@rohub.com" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Even Fyllingen" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <mailto:georgehadib@gmail.com> <http://schema.org/name> "Geo H." ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <mailto:ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com> <http://schema.org/email> "ingerid.reinertsen@rohub.com" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Ingerid Reinertsen" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
  <mailto:ole.solheim@rohub.com> <http://schema.org/email> "ole.solheim@rohub.com" ;
    <http://schema.org/name> "Ole Solheim" ;
    a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Agent> .
}