http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#Head http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#assertion http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#provenance http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasPublicationInfo http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#Nanopublication http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#assertion http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ActionNeededComment http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ContentComment http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#NegativeComment http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#ReviewComment http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasCommentText It should be better explained why the WiseNET ontology redefines part of the content of ifcowl (e.g. properties “aggregates”, “spaceContains”). Why isn’t it enough to extract a fragment of ifcowl and use it in integration with other ontology modules? This would allow to skip a few query+update steps in the proposed methodology. http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#hasImpact 3 http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/f3#figure http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/t4#table http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#comment-7 https://github.com/LaraHack/linkflows_model/blob/master/Linkflows.ttl#refersTo http://purl.org/nanopub/temp/linkflows/sample-paper-3/v1/t5#table http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#provenance http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#hadPrimarySource http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SW-180298 http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#assertion http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo https://orcid.org/0000-0000-0000-0000 http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8#pubinfo http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://purl.org/dc/terms/created 2019-11-26T09:05:11+01:00 http://purl.org/np/RA4fcBrQcn5f4QvdK_eEQ0RilYDwZkneSlIAj33VCfsT8 http://purl.org/pav/createdBy https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-6459