sub:provenance {
  sub:assertion dcterms:description "[In subgroup analyses based on pathological type, the Pro variant was significantly associated with an increased esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) risk in all four genetic comparison models (ORPro vs. Arg=1.26, 95% CI: 1.08-1.47, POR=0.003; OR Recessive genetic model=1.42, 95% CI: 1.07-1.88, POR=0.015; ORDominant genetic model=1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.42, POR=0.001; ORHomozygote model=1.55, 95% CI: 1.14-2.10, POR=0.005), whereas the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and esophageal adenocarcinoma risk was still uncertain owing to the limited studies included in this meta-analysis.]. Sentence from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine."@en ;
    wi:evidence dgn-void:source_evidence_literature ;
    sio:SIO_000772 miriam-pubmed:20389250 ;
    prov:wasDerivedFrom dgn-void:BEFREE ;
    prov:wasGeneratedBy eco:ECO_0000203 .
  dgn-void:BEFREE pav:importedOn "2017-02-19"^^xsd:date .
  dgn-void:source_evidence_literature a eco:ECO_0000212 ;
    rdfs:comment "Gene-disease associations inferred from text-mining the literature."@en ;
    rdfs:label "DisGeNET evidence - LITERATURE"@en .
}